These changes are grounded in prioritizing high-impact titles and further investing in Bethesda’s portfolio of blockbuster games and beloved worlds which you have nurtured over many decades.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 127 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You close Tango the developers behind your only recent good game, but keep 343 open. Ok Phil.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

Pentiment and Psychonauts were great too so RIP to those studios 🫠

[–] mynachmadarch@kbin.social 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Most of the upper eschalon of 343 have left or were kicked out over the last year, including some of the worst offenders who drove the creation of the crap we've had recently such as Kiki Wolf kill.

It seems like they're internally rebuilding 343 because they know how much of a powerhouse that IP can be if done right. I'm not optimistic about the next Halo, but cautiously hopeful now at least.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I doubt it is even thoughts over how powerful Halo is as an IP. I would be shocked if MS corporate hadn't realized that any 343 Halo is going to get shit on because "this isn't Bungie". And people hate 343 enough that firing them and pushing the leads out won't raise any red flags.

But yeah. Look at how much damage control MS did when they were releasing fucking Pentiment on switch (look, I love that game with all my heart but you know things are fucked when people remember it exists). There is zero chance 343 "closes" until the next full generation... probably that gen's refresh SKU consoles. Because it would instantly be interpreted as "xbox is dead".

But gutting Bethesda? We already see people in this very thread talking about how it is good because they didn't like a game one of the studios did.

[–] mynachmadarch@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

It's possible people won't accept a new game just because of the name attached, but that's not what I'm seeing.

I still play Infinite pretty heavily and most of the people I chat with there are saying the same, thank the lord leadership changed, let's give it a year or two and see.

After that, who knows.

[–] Nimrod@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Don’t get my hopes up.

If halo infinite had been a well balanced Battle Royale game… I’d probably have thrown away everything I love due to overplaying a damn game.

I’m just so sick of multiplayer shooters. The repetition didn’t seem so bad when I was young, but now it just numbs my brain.

But BR is the perfect combo of “my squad vs the world” that you get in a PVE coop, but also the rush of beating real life opponents that makes you keep coming back.

Warzone is all my friends play now, but it’s gotten so stale that no one really pushes to squad up too frequently.

Sorry for the tangent rant.

[–] mynachmadarch@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Halo infinite multiplayer is free. The forge community has created a battle royale mode I've heard. Maybe give it a shot? I don't know anything other than it exists.

I personally can't stand battle royale games, so sorry, but I hope the next isn't. It's just not what Halo is. If they released a mode, or a side game as a Battle Royale I'm all for it, but not a full main game.

I feel the burnout though. My normal gaming friends and I are in a mode of trying new games right now and don't play together as much.

[–] Nimrod@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, to each their own!

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Am I the only one that felt Hi-fi Rush was a disappointment? I played plenty of rhythm games and Hi-fi Rush just felt off throughout, landing beats didn't feel satisfying and it felt off sync at timee. The story was well I can see people liking it but it felt too Disney-ish and cringe for me. I couldn't get past playing it after the 2nd level.

It's an interesting concept but I can't call it a good game.