343
submitted 4 months ago by pro_grammer@programming.dev to c/steam@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JoshuaSlowpoke777@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

That being said, I question how that applies in this context. Corporate leadership doesn’t exactly strike me as trustworthy nor worthy of mercy, although that could be a lean toward cynicism on my part.

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 8 points 4 months ago

If we don't change reviews back then they have no reason to keep their word. Lose lose

We do change reviews back they have good reviews and need to keep their word to ensure this doesn't happen again. Win win

We change reviews back they lie, we just change ours back to negative again and go about our days. Lose lose

[-] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 4 months ago

You've got that backwards.

They've been convicted in the court of public opinion. This reversal doesn't make them innocent of their crimes, but it does justify reducing the sentence to parole.

The black mark stays on their record, but they have the opportunity to start rebuilding trust. If they want good reviews on future titles they need to avoid squandering the chance to prove they deserve them.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
343 points (96.0% liked)

Steam

8517 readers
3 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS