this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
478 points (100.0% liked)

196

16488 readers
1883 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There are no ethical choices under first-past-the-post voting. We must instead make a decision that reduces the most harm.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're a reformist Democratic Socialist, who wishes to create Democratic Socialism.

Social Democracy is first and foremost Capitalism with Social Safety Nets. The underlying principle of Social Democracy is that Capitalism is unjust if left alone, but can be weilded in the interests of all. You clearly disagree with this notion, so why identify with it?

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You do not speak for me. I am social democrat. We need the market economy of capitalism. We just don't need share holders or private business owners.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Social democracy. Trying to tell me what I believe with an arbitrary system of rigid definitions is both ineffective and easily refuted argument.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm aware of what you believe, I am also aware of what the systems that describe your beliefs are referred to by everyone else.

I am not telling you what you believe, but what the label is.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

I recommend a descriptive approach to definitions as opposed to a prescriptive approach. I think that would resolve a lot of the discourse we are having. I have explained what I mean in my argument. Your argument centers on this false idea that definitions can limit what a person thinks and believes. But definitions are only as useful as they help us communicate.