143
submitted 1 year ago by iraq_lobster@lemm.ee to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] astramist@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

What could possibly be OK with Starlink if it has THIS?

[-] iraq_lobster@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

well in fact there are multiple sat trains over the northern hemisphere lol ( and some on the south), according to the online sat tracker. apparently those trains help mitigate peak hour bandwidth usage, but i dont know better. still, thats an abnormal sight to have.

[-] astramist@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I recognize Starlink's advantage over other providers, but just compare the number of satellites they have.

  • Viasat: 2, plans to launch a third.
  • HughesNet: 3.
  • Starlink: Over 3,000. Plans to increase to 12,000. Each of them must be replaced every 5 years. At the same time, SpaceX doesn't yet have any ideas on how to bring old satellites down to Earth.

WTF?! Starlink provides such a better service to justify the multiple satellite count difference? This is despite the fact that they have a short lifespan and often go out of their orbit and smash into space debris, increasing the amount of space debris. Huh...

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
143 points (96.7% liked)

Science

13018 readers
11 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS