this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
1248 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

11161 readers
2304 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fun facts: the UK has crazy laws protecting trees and hedgerows. There's a national tree registry for old boys.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 34 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

We should really have representatives for non humans in government that are meant to function at an economic loss/investment as a way of giving back. Too often these departments get pushed to deliver ecosystem services. We need to learn to give back without it being transactional. Make gift culture great again. Elect a Lorax.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's called environmental protection groups, animal rights groups, etc. Plenty don't want to listen, though

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean literally representatives like senators not interest groups.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Who is going to keep them accountable? Trees have a record high abstention rate, and if these representatives are elected by humans that's just proportional voting with veneer on top.

Democracy is about balancing levers, and that's why there is more than one branch of government. Special interest groups do have power, and so does the judiciary (who may sue the government for unlawful cutting down of trees) and the executive (who may have power to declare certain government-owned land to be Protected).

The real ecologist move would be to write a duty to protect the environment into the constitution, so that the judiciary can strike down any law that does anything to the contrary.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I believe at least one state—Wyoming, maybe—has a guarantee in its constitution that citizens will have a clean and healthy environment, or something along those lines. It effectively creates a duty to protect the environment.

Edit: it's Montana.

[–] Almrond@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I was going to say, definitely not Wyoming. Too many oil and gas companies absolutely destroy the areas they are in. I lived in Edgerton for a bit, there is literally no potable water in town, you will make yourself incredibly sick drinking out of the tap because of the drilling in the area. That's just one of very many examples.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago

I would argue most things in government should be ran in the black or red. There's just a certain type of person who wants to turn everything Into a for profit.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You may like Bruno Latour and his rather philosophical book Politics of Nature. I read it in a philosophy seminar and it seemed fascinating how the author tries to completely overthrow the view we have on "nature" and give it agency.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

Yes thank you. This is more helpful than you realise.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

Can I just get Danny DeVito?