this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
-122 points (20.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
506 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    -122
    nuclear take: (lemmy.world)
    submitted 6 months ago by DanTDM@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Also have a copy of pacman-static somewhere so that you can fix your shit in case of a partial upgrade (and trust me, it can go horribly wrong)

    Oh I know, I quickly learned to never update it without having live media nearby to arch-chroot with.

    if you make your arch system unable to boot..... Don't use arch

    The only thing I did to make it unbootable is to update it. Going by that logic nobody should use it.

    This is not my attempt at elitism. Arch was never meant to be a hassle free distro and it sure as shit is not one.

    I definitely agree, that's why I'm commenting against dumbasses suggesting it to beginners. Especially when they glorify AUR.

    Can I offer you a Debian in these trying times?

    No need, I already landed on MX + nix after 2+ years of arch. Nix unstable gives me all of the benefits of arch (except for the DE) and then plenty more on top. Different downsides, but far less stressful. I'm

    [–] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    You need to keep the update log and go through the whole thing and see if something needs reconfiguring. Sounds shitty? Yeah, that's why I stopped using Arch and Gentoo despite being a veteran

    Nowadays I just install Debian or some derivative and call it a damn day. Unless you need some exotic setup (and those are more suited to Gentoo or Slackware anyway)

    [–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

    Oh I had a far simpler method: update and it fails to boot? Rollback and try updating again in a week. It usually works then, but I had to wait a bit more a couple of times.

    The only exception was that bad GRUB release. I think that's the only update fail that absolutely required arch-chroot.