Fuck Cars

9677 readers

1150 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

[meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
[article] for news articles
[blog] for any blog-style content
[video] for video resources
[academic] for academic studies and sources
[discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
[meme] for memes
[image] for any non-meme images
[misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

!yimby@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ConfidentLonely@lemmy.world

Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world

toaster@slrpnk.net

1081

[meme] Lawns and car storage — name a more wasteful use of land (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

168 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lawns are a result of setback requirements imposed because people were building structures right up to and sometimes over the street.

And that's a problem because...?

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Height clearance for emergency vehicles ("over the road"), utility servicing, having space to actually have a fire hydrant is important, fire breaks, etc

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

All that stuff should be accommodated for in the public right-of-way (which includes more than the paved part of the street itself, and usually ends somewhere in the vicinity of the outside edge of the sidewalk). It still doesn't persuade me that we need setbacks in the private property beyond that.

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 7 points 7 months ago

Exactly, setbacks are classic NIMBY (NIMFY?) bullshit.