this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
328 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

32456 readers
600 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The legal situation is more complex and nuanced than the headline implies, so the article is worth reading. This adds another ruling to the confusing case history regarding forced biometric unlocking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's not completely true. In most states if they are knocking down your door with a search warrant and you flush a kilo of heroin down the toilet, you're getting an evidence tampering charge that will hold up in court.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you only flushed it after hearing them knock on the door.

[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 1 points 8 months ago

There's a whole lot of caselaw surrounding this, and they will get someone to destroy the pipes to find out when they were flushed (their word goes, good luck finding someone impartial to say that wasn't what happened). I wish court cases were built on 1's and 0's like computer code but that's just not the way the world works.

https://www.augustachronicle.com/story/news/2011/05/27/evidence-recovery-can-be-dirty-job-police/14540952007/