161
submitted 5 months ago by nekandro@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago

Your claim is that if I can track something to within 20m, I can't send a fighter (or multiple) up to engage with it?

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No, my assertion is that airspace is very dynamic battlefield.

Just because you can track a possible stealth aircraft several hundred nautical miles off you're coast, does not guarantee your ability to intercept it with aircraft before it drops it's payload, or that your SAM sites will be able to get a missile targeting lock.

It's just a first step.

[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 months ago

And this is also true of conventional jet intercepts. Point being, the problem of stealth is basically no longer a problem.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

Interceptors haven't been a thing since the cold war. BVR engagements have been the air to air norm for many years, and that requires a weapons grade targeting lock.

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
161 points (94.5% liked)

World News

32089 readers
992 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS