this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
930 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3234 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

I work in bot protection and it's a sound idea but doesn't really work in practice. As long as there's more than 1$ of value to be gained it's worth it for the bot makers.

This also makes it so that botting is only accesible to select few actors that have the required resources i.e. russian troll farms or large bot networks from china, in turn this increases their value. This is very good for them.

Reality is that the only way to stop bots is to constantly change up the detection system. This is called a "cat and mouse" sort of problem and it really is the only way to do it. The attacker always has to catch up and it can be trivial that takes them couple of hours to do but it also reveals behavior patterns for marking bot accounts. This actually works really well in practice but requires a lot of dev resources and many companies low-key like bots which is another thread entirely.

[–] hanekam@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'll ask anyway. Why do companies like bots?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As Kungen already answered - stats! You can sell bot traffic as real traffic which inflates your numbers.

For stuff like social media, bots increase engagement too. Many new products and networks actually generate a lot of fake content to attract organic growth. I.e. if bot likes your comment you're likely to engage more. If it likes your product review you're likely to review more stuff etc.

Tracking bots can also generate reverse analytics. For example if you know that your competitors are scraping fishing equipment data from your store it could mean they're working on a competing fishing related product.

Lastly, you can feed fake data to bots to manipulate competitors. This is somewhat illegal (no real legal precedent yet afaik though its a clear intent to harm other businesses) but it can really powerful in the wrong hands.

Edit: worth nothing that a lot of bot traffic is good. Sometimes you want to be scraped as it is a form of organic engagement and increases the value of your data and often backlinks growth (e.g. indexers like Google etc)

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Perpetual growth/engagement statistics?

[–] hanekam@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How true is the dead internet theory, in your view?

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] hanekam@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nei, jeg er kjøtt og blod og stål og smøreolje som deg

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Hmm, jeg tror desværre jeg består af et 100% syntetisk keramisk bomuldsprodukt...

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

More eyeballs.

Enough updoots or retweets and other algos pick up on it. Some random twitter discussion ends up on BuzzFeed, YTers start making influencer vids, and Reddit / Lemmy repost bots.

Do this enough and it'll gain traction. Now everyone is talking about your stupid fuckin Stanley mug, corporate rumor,or political talking point.

And this can be automated end to end, 24/7, by market and keyword, will real time feedback as to how well it's doing via upvotes, shares, likes, or even data mining emails and convos via Gmail or WhatsApp.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Bot protection? Call me ignorant but what exactly do you do?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

develop systems that can identify unwanted users like bots, spammers, people who abuse the product and break ToS etc. Most bad actors are very dumb but fighting this at scale is actually very interesting. Also most bots (like 90%) are just scrapers (data collectors) especially when it comes to Twitter which has absurd API pricings but cost almost nothing to scrape lol

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Oh my god I’m a fuckin idiot. Granted, I’ve had a couple drinks tonight but I thought you were protecting bots… not protecting against them lol

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

yeah sorry "protection against bots" just doesn't roll of the tongue as easily lol

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Protect the bots!!!

[–] helpme@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

people who abuse the product and break TOS

You're welcome.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Hey man it gets me employed and I even get to work on foss on work hours sometimes. Thanks! :)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

As long as there’s more than 1$ of value to be gained it’s worth it for the bot makers.

That's what I was coming in here to suggest, so I'm glad someone in the field was able to back that idea up. I think it's unlikely many bots that aren't made for fun are being put on Twitter unless they are generating a lot more than $1 for whoever is putting them up.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This also makes it so that botting is only accesible to select few actors that have the required resources i.e. russian troll farms or large bot networks from china, in turn this increases their value. This is very good for them.

I'd bet that is explicitly part of the funding model. Pay to influence consensus, cuz this is a publicly traded stock and numbers need to go up, regardless of who is paying.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Twitter is private. Musk took it private when he bought it.

[–] McDropout@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes only Russia and China do bad things with technology!

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Never had to deal with attacks originating from US or Europe so thats kinda true actually :)

[–] McDropout@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Go to r/worldnews and r/europe on reddit

The amount of bots is….