this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
860 points (99.4% liked)

Linux

48115 readers
659 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 51 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Do you know what this smells like? Corruption and consulting companies with friends in the govt looking for ways to profit.

No it doesn't. It smells like Microsoft has a monopoly on office software, and city employees are not tech enthusiasts. Anyone who used Office at home or in another job is going to complain when they have to learn a new software (regardless of which is "better" - for the average person, different is bad)

Plus, every document they receive from outside is almost certainly formatted in Office, so if there isn't 100% compatibility, people will again complain.

Migrating an entire enterprise to FOSS software is not easy, and in government where leadership changes can be more regular, it's not shocking to see the pendulum swing back and forth.

[–] GlowHuddy@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Could be both of those things as well.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

Definitely could be both, but I'd posit that it would still happen regardless of corruption, just because they're taking on the ambitious task of trying something new.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Plus, every document they receive from outside is almost certainly formatted in Office, so if there isn't 100% compatibility, people will again complain.

That’s not like that with governments. Governments are huge clients, they can and should dictate file formats to suppliers.

If the state of Santa Catarina in Brazil, with a GDP of 2/3 of that of Munich, could transition to Open Document Format almost 20 years ago, Munich can.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They definitely can dictate requirements, however that means that you're now making your staff play document format police.

I'm not saying it's impossible, just that it's an additional headache. If I were working in that office, I'd die a little inside each time I have to go back to a consultant/contractor/community member and say "can you please resubmit this, the formatting is broken when I open it in Libre Office"

Yes, again, they have the authority to do this, and it is technically feasible, but it's going to be a bad user experience for a long time until everyone is properly "retrained". Especially if you're working with partners outside of Germany who have their own document standards.

I'm not saying this is a bad move, just that I understand why they might be inclined to jump back and forth.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

your staff play document format police.

Often the email filter will just convert everything not allowed to PDF.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

For the average person; msoffice and libreoffice function pretty much the same. Even the icons mostly match.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh, cool, so I can have multiple people editing a live document at the same time?