255
Jane Goodall rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] seth@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

1 & 3: yes. 2: I'm wondering if when they talked about a panic in science, they meant a panic in not-science, like maybe pop science news or religion?

Right now there are a number of pop science news articles and channels saying physicists are panicking over Webb's confirmation of Hubble's observations of Cepheid variable stars and the expansion of the universe. But I haven't heard any actual physicists panicking, unless panicking means finding it really interesting and wanting to know more and do more observations and research.

Or maybe they meant there was a panic reaction to science news among religious politicians and public figures who were given a huge platform? They are always looking for ways to think of humans as distinctly more special than other animals. And they're always looking for ways to deny rights to anyone who isn't cis or straight.

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
255 points (100.0% liked)

196

16243 readers
2757 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS