this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
215 points (96.1% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2752 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Microplastics have been found in historic soil samples for the first time, according to a new study, potentially upending the way archaeological remains are preserved.

Researchers found microplastics in soil deposits more than seven meters (23 feet) underground, which were deposited in the first or second century CE and excavated in the 1980s, a team led by researchers from the University of York in the United Kingdom said in a statement published Friday.

In total, the study identified 16 different microplastic polymer types in contemporary and archived soil samples, the statement adds.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] p3e7@lemm.ee 56 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Am I reading the article wrong? The plastics come from the storage containers. Therefore the heading is quite misleading.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 44 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

in my reading of the the article it discusses contamination in-situ with environmenal micro-plastics, even in soil samples that were taken from the early 80s (indicating that microplastic contamination has been a problem for a while).

in-situ preservation of artefacts are now being called in to question because microplastics can change the environment around the artefact, leading to damage.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I wouldn’t figure that 16 different types of polymers would be discovered if the storage container were the issue.

Seems more likely that rainwater has been seeping down into the soil carrying the pollutants with it, and even as early as the 80s extracted items already contained a multitude of traces.

We really fucked shit up. That means I’ve never known a world with clean water, air, or soil, and I’m middle aged already.

Fuck do we do now?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Step 1: vote the republiQans out

It's coincidence that the first samples they found microplastics in are from the 80s, but it's also a metaphor.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The cancer of neoliberalism metastasized in 1980 with the election of Ronald Reagan.

Technically speaking Carter was also a neoliberal, but he was the Democratic brand that did things like put solar panels on the White House, because he wasn't a simpering, oil industry boot licking reactionary as well.