this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
879 points (95.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
506 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    879
    Indeed (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
    submitted 7 months ago by 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    205 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Norgur@fedia.io 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Ugly, apt-induced breakup I suppose? :P

    [–] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    no way anyone would voluntarily use apt after using pacman

    [–] Norgur@fedia.io 3 points 7 months ago

    well, for 90% of users it makes literally no difference whatsoever. It's just the command you have to type in so you can get new software.

    [–] zarenki@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

    As someone who used to use Arch a decade ago: I still use pacman for devkitpro at least, and I do miss how fast its parallel downloads get, but the tool I use to manage packages is far from the most important difference between distros to me, even if you assume not needing AUR.

    [–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    I unironically prefer apt over pacman, simply because my monkeybrain got addicted to running pacman -S (that was how to update, right?) and I dropped in productivity. apt is just "nah fam, there's nothing new for you" most days, which gives me the quiet time I want and need.

    I ran Manjaro BTW. It was nice while it lasted, but Debian is my new friend now.

    [–] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 7 months ago

    The difference here is more between release types, I think. Arch is rolling, so there are updates you can get every few minutes. Debian is a rock, and rocks aren't known for moving a lot.

    (The command is sudo pacman -Syu btw)

    [–] 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Look at the sub 😉. They switched to xbps 😁.