this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
116 points (84.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
751 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    116
    Nixos. (feddit.de)
    submitted 7 months ago by Johanno@feddit.de to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    Well let's see if it is worth it or if I go back to debian.

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] taanegl@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Me: *declares an app*\

    nixpkgs: Oh what's that, you wanted an entire extra desktop stack inside a separate closure? Yes, sir!

    Me: plz no

    [–] pbsds@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Try installing a cinnamon app on a gnome distro and you get the same dependencies pulled in, but also put in PATH

    [–] taanegl@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    This is my problem, perhaps not with nixpkgs, but nixpkgs:nixos-{stable|unstable}. Throughout history the call to fame for distribution is not all the fancy bells and whistles, but the cohesiveness and stability of the stack - the entire stack.

    I'm not saying this is a flaw of nixpkgs, but rather a fair amount of technical debt on the of part NixOS maintainers and developers. It's a vast movable system of modules, while being immutable at the same time. It ain't easy. So more contribution is needed.

    I'm happy that people join and help with that. I'll still use NixOS and nixpkgs for embedded, specialised cases, even as servers, but I'm not going to run it on a workstation. But, I'm hopeful for the future. I'd like to run it, but not yet.

    It's not really necessary anyways, nix can run on any system... now onto my adventures of bringing nix to an immutable Fedora system without a container or VM lol