this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
528 points (99.8% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2342 readers
94 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“We’re really at an infant stage in terms of our clinical ability to assess traumatic brain injury,” a medical expert said.

Before he ended his life, Ryan Larkin made his family promise to donate his brain to science.

The 29-year-old Navy SEAL was convinced years of exposure to blasts had badly damaged his brain, despite doctors telling him otherwise. He had downloaded dozens of research papers on traumatic brain injury out of frustration that no one was taking him seriously, his father said.

“He knew,” Frank Larkin said. “I’ve grown to understand that he was out to prove that he was hurt, and he wasn’t crazy.”

In 2017, a postmortem study found that Ryan Larkin, a combat medic and instructor who taught SEALs how to breach buildings with explosives, had a pattern of brain scarring unique to service members who’ve endured repeated explosions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sekrayray@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago (6 children)

I know I’m a minority but as someone who works in emergency medicine I think the opposite.

If you come in thinking you have something there’s probably good reason, and I damn well better be sure you don’t have it if I’m going to send you home. You know your body better than me. It may not mean we test for it, but I need solid clinical decision making tools to support not testing for it

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Usually that tool is that I'm a woman

[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It could be an embolism, but first let's check to make sure you aren't pregnant...

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

True, they might end up in prison for treating you...

[–] Sekrayray@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don’t understand, do you mean risk stratification in a specific clinical practice guideline based on gender?

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I mean that doctors (emergency or otherwise) tend not to listen to me because I am a woman.

This changes when a (cis, white) man is present.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Happened to my ex wife, and I assume it keeps happening. She has Graves disease for years and told Drs something was wrong, but since she was heavy they just told her to lose weight.

It was left so long by the time they caught it that the cognitive decline that thyroid problems give you, were irreversible

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Thats terrible :( I am so sorry

[–] Sekrayray@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m sorry that happens to you. Unfortunately it’s a documented phenomenon (especially with rheumatologic diagnoses—I’ve explained that to residents a lot).

Here’s to hoping more attention to this leads to better education which can prevent it.

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Thank you - and thank you for doing your part to educate residents!

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That’s how it should be. It’s astonishing to me that some doctors don’t take the chance that the patient might be right

[–] Sekrayray@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I just don’t understand how you can ethically practice with the opening assumption that your patient is wrong.

I get just as angry when staff get judgy about who goes to the ER when. Everyone defines their own emergencies. It’s why we’re there 24/7/365. For a lot of people we are the only no questions asked lifeline that’s always open (at least in the US)

[–] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Yeah, you're definitely in the minority.

It's a shame too. A lot of this occurs due to the egos of medical professionals, rather than genuine concern that the patient might be going off the basis of misinformation.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Was also sadly my experience. Got a cut because of a collapse, told them that I have heart failure since a kid and this felt strange, but they never did any tests, just wanted to send me to the psych unit.

That was a pretty fucked evening...

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What’s the rest of the story? (If you don’t mind sharing) This feels wildly incomplete.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, the doctor that sewed my cut was quite reasonable and I could at least leave.

All that happened because of an anonymous call, that I just had a long term relationship behind me.

Thing is, that they just ignored my initial report, as they immediately switched to the story of an anonymous caller. Which is a pretty shitty move

Anything more in details, and I'll completely lose my pseudonymity, sorry

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

No worries, and thank you for sharing.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I'm sure you think this and for people with decent insurance it may be true.

Never once have I ever received adequate medical assistance in my entire life.

Hell I was once even sent home with appendicitis AFTER testing confirmed it.

American for-profit medicine is a joke and untold people die from it every year.

[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

#notanexpert . my understanding that ER/ED basically only have moderate responsibility to judge that you will not die and sue them in the next ~24h after an event. they tell you to seek further primary care when discharged.

[–] Sekrayray@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

The job of EM is stabilization and resuscitation. That takes a wide array of forms depending on your presenting condition. There is no “time limit” on what entails a safely dischargeable condition—if you present with chest pain, we CT you, and don’t find an immediately emergent cause of your chest pain, but in the process we fail to tell you about the lung nodule on your CT that turns out to be a CA that kills you in several years we are still liable. Maybe in certain states we are not medical legally liable at that point, but I would argue that we ethically still are. We are still all physicians (unless you’re getting treated by an APP).

In the context of stabilization and resuscitation I personally have the take that if you present with something I can’t adequately diagnose in the ED (let’s say I can rule out life threats but you still have a condition that is compromising your quality of life) then for the next step I really have to ensure adequate follow up for you (subspecialty referral, etc). That goes for the underinsured as well. It can get tricky, but that’s what case managers and social workers are for. Maybe I’m just biased because I work in academics. In general if you need emergency care I highly recommend that you go out of your way to get to an academic center because you’ll be more likely to get plugged in in this regard.