this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
736 points (96.5% liked)

Science Memes

10988 readers
2068 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
736
Malaria (fedia.io)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by jeena@jemmy.jeena.net to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kralk@lemm.ee 36 points 8 months ago (3 children)

He fucking did! Why the downvotes? He personally lobbied governments to make sure nobody released the patents to allow cheap vaccinations in developing countries

[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Gates got a bunch of defenders for some reason

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 0 points 8 months ago

some people like to join the winning team. It makes them feel like winnners themselves.

[–] kebabslob@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago

I guess it doesn't fit the good billionaire narrative

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Civil society organizations active in poorer nations, including Doctors Without Borders, expressed discomfort with the notion that Western-dominated groups, staffed by elite teams of experts, would be helping guide life-and-death decisions affecting people in poorer nations. Those tensions only increased when the Gates Foundation opposed efforts to waive intellectual property rights, a move that critics saw as protecting the interests of pharmaceutical giants over people living poorer nations

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/14/global-covid-pandemic-response-bill-gates-partners-00053969

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yikes. Do you know what justification was given?

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

i remember hearing, that their argument was, that a strong profit-incentive would motive the manufacturer to increase production as well as quality. I also remember that the debate around that topic was drowned out by some weirder theories. E.g. during that time q-anon was on the rise, and some people argued, that the gates foundation was using covid to implant microchips into people or something like that

source: my memory from a couple years back

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Thanks. Sounds like the same ol "free market" argument then.

[–] SporeAdic@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

A not insignificant line of reasoning (though probably less important to people in power than the profit incentive) was also to keep the secrets of making the vaccine from bring revealed to other countries, which would apparently erode the USA's pharmaceutical research advantage. An interesting article about this from the former director of NIST is here but I don't necessarily agree with the reasoning.