this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
37 points (97.4% liked)

Autism

6846 readers
1 users here now

A community for respectful discussion and memes related to autism acceptance. All neurotypes are welcome.

We have created our own instance! Visit Autism Place the following community for more info.

Community:

Values

  • Acceptance
  • Openness
  • Understanding
  • Equality
  • Reciprocity
  • Mutuality
  • Love

Rules

  1. No abusive, derogatory, or offensive post/comments e.g: racism, sexism, religious hatred, homophobia, gatekeeping, trolling.
  2. Posts must be related to autism, off-topic discussions happen in the matrix chat.
  3. Your posts must include a text body. It doesn't have to be long, it just needs to be descriptive.
  4. Do not request donations.
  5. Be respectful in discussions.
  6. Do not post misinformation.
  7. Mark NSFW content accordingly.
  8. Do not promote Autism Speaks.
  9. General Lemmy World rules.

Encouraged

  1. Open acceptance of all autism levels as a respectable neurotype.
  2. Funny memes.
  3. Respectful venting.
  4. Describe posts of pictures/memes using text in the body for our visually impaired users.
  5. Welcoming and accepting attitudes.
  6. Questions regarding autism.
  7. Questions on confusing situations.
  8. Seeking and sharing support.
  9. Engagement in our community's values.
  10. Expressing a difference of opinion without directly insulting another user.
  11. Please report questionable posts and let the mods deal with it. Chat Room
  • We have a chat room! Want to engage in dialogue? Come join us at the community's Matrix Chat.

.

Helpful Resources

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi All. I have been watching a lot of House lately, and just started "Extrodinary Attorney Woo". I am curious to know what you all think of their portrails of Autism. Is it pandering? Representation? Romantisation?

Also see "The Good Doctor", "Atypical", "Love on the spectrum" etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Good representations I've seen:

  • Abed Nadir (Community)
  • Tina Belcher (Bob's Burgers)
  • Jonah Byrde (Ozark)
  • Woo Young-Woo (Extraordinary Attorney Woo)

These characters all made me feel validated and seen, while not being put in their respective shows only to make fun of them. Sometimes their autism is used to create humorous situations, like Tina and Young-Woo, but it's never done in a mean-spirited way.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

All of the Belchers are great representation, though none are canonically Autistic.

[–] retrolasered@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

I <3 the belchers

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They literally say Tina is autistic in the first episode of the show.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Louise: She's autistic. She can't help it.

Tina: Yeah, I'm Autistic.

Hugo: Bob.

Bob: Just a sec. No, you're not autistic, Tina

Is that the reference? Cause that looks pretty definitively like a child mocking another child and not a diagnosis or canon confirmation. The only other reference in that episode is a callback joke to this bit.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay and the same could be said for Abed Nadir or Jonah Byrde, or basically any other character mentioned in this thread. But these characters are all obviously autistic coded in their respective shows. The reality is that show writers are extremely hesitant to make their characters explicitly autistic because then they have to treat that character as an ambassador for Autism.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Cool. See my first comment where I said all of the Belchers were good representation (meaning coded-as and good reps of) but not canonically autistic. So, what point were you trying to make?

Also, Abed is canonically Autistic, just not diagnosed (as per show runners)

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I've only seen one episode of Woo, and it felt to me like they were treating her autism as a magical attorney super power. I wasnt sure if that was valued representation or not, hence the question. I guess its not wildly different to seeing neurotypical characters with extraordinary abilities. I did enjoy it though, and will keep watching.

Love me some Troy and Abed in the Mooorrrrninngg :D

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Woo definitely gets better, but you have to acknowledge that there are some "super power" autism people out there (I personally fall more on that side of the spectrum). That being said, they don't shy away from the other side of the spectrum and they don't claim that one kind of autist has more worth than another.

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I was friends with a guy in my youth who definitely had savant aspects. Things he was interested in mostly. For example he loved cars. Not motorcycles, not big rigs, just cars.

In a 4 hour car ride he would look out the window and give details about the cars and at the end of the ride you could ask him about car models that we'd seen between certain mile markers. He had it all catalogued in his head and could tell you what order the cars were in, their color, year, options, weight, GVWR, motor type, style, transmission type, really just about anything.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I get that its a spectrum, but I dont know the distribution, hence why I am seeking opinions here.

I guess i was just worried that it sets up an unrealistic expectation/stereotype, that may not be beneficial?

"Oh you have autism? Thats so cool, whats your super power?" - This kinda of thing. Kind of the Autism version of "Oh, your asian, you must be good at math".

Ill definitely watch the rest of Woo anyway, I did enjoy the first episode.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, it definitely paints a complete picture. You'll see once you reach episode 3. Episode 10 was my personal favourite though. It felt very validating seeing some of the struggles she experiences in that one.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

Cool, good to know, thanks!

[–] ladytaters@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I really loved Woo, partially because the show really takes the time to get into how she gets around things like sensory issues. She's a savant, which is rare.

[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've never gotten an acoustic vibe from Tina.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago

She really brings more of an electric energy to the show