this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
194 points (90.1% liked)

World News

39364 readers
2556 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not voting against Trump is enabling even more genocide and the end of some women and minority rights so don't pretend like you've got the moral high ground if your refuse to vote because of the Democrats stance on Israel.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They absolutely have the moral highground. Fuck a president that enables genocide and funds it. Saying "oh don't be a single issue voter!" when the issue is "stop mass killings of people with a single phone call" is so out of this world, it's just insane.

Time for a third party, plain and simple.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

If literal genocide cannot convince liberals to consider third parties, then I'm convinced they will never support third parties. This is the duopolies Sandy Hook moment. If you see Genocide A or Genocide B and don't seek a third option, you will never seek a third option.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sure but that third party doesn't exist so you knowingly letting an even worse option win thus enabling even more genocide just shows you didn't really care about genocides in the first place