this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
596 points (76.3% liked)

Science Memes

11205 readers
1484 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geissi@feddit.de 18 points 8 months ago (3 children)

“human scale” is dismissed as even existing by the Celsius users

Celsius user here.
I find "I'm more used to it, therefore it makes more intuitive sense to me" is a perfectly understandable argument.

The problem with the human scale argument is that it makes it sound completely arbitrary.
To a human there is no objective difference between -1F, 0F or +1F. They are all about the same degree of "cold".

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

i mean a lot of measurements are arbitrary necause their manmade. thats creation of measurements in a nutshell. they exist to give people context to conpare to. time is a manmade construct, unit of length is a manmade construct. unit of weight is a manmade construct.

for instance with 1 kilo, tell me the last time a regular person had platinum-iridium ingot. its completely arbitrary.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

tell me the last time a regular person had platinum-iridium ingot

What, you don't?

But yeah, I agree, units are made up. I mean, why is the boiling point at 100C and not any other number? Someone made it up.
I'm just saying the argument "0F is really cold" is just as true as -10F is really cold or +10F is really cold.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Is there a difference between 19, 20, and 21 Celsius? It's also pretty subtle. Yes, there's a bigger difference than fahrenheit, but I've never cared regardless of scale down to what degree the temperature is. As a fahrenheit user, it's always 10s. 0-10, 10-20, etc.

[–] geissi@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

Is there a difference between 19, 20, and 21 Celsius?

First off, nobody claimed that Celsius is based on human perception so humans not being able to differentiate between these is simply irrelevant to the argument.
Second, the bounds of 0 and 100 are based on the freezing temp of water which are specific, non-arbitrary temperatures.

I'm not arguing one system over the other, I just think the "human scale" argument has been made up just to have an argument.

[–] hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Is there a difference between 19, 20, and 21 Celsius?

Yes, as anyone that’s ever worked in an office can tell you.

Edit: Apparently I was expecting too much cognitive ability / common knowledge so let me be clearer: Generally women prefer it warmer (>20), men like it cooler (<20). It’s a very common office discussion.

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works -4 points 8 months ago

So either way the “human scale” idea is fucking dumb

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Also when they describe their fahrenheit human scale it is "0 is really cold" and "100 is really hot", which are subjective and not very informative gauges of anything.