My assumptions are fine but yours are wrong.

That's all you managed to communicate just now. It's impressive that you can be so smug without saying anything besides alluding to some vague "psychology of abuse".

If you're not getting into specifics that kind of comment doesn't make you sound well read it makes you sound like the "do your own research" antivaxxers discussed elsewhere in the thread. I'm not sure why you'd bother with a low effort retort like that. You're certainly not required to participate in the discussion any further but don't delude yourself into thinking you're dropping some knowledge bomb on the uneducated by bowing out in such a fashion. It's lazy and overdone.