this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
170 points (92.1% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2571 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A weakening economy and increasing political repression are forcing ever more Chinese people to emigrate. Spurred by TikTok, many are seeking more sustainable conditions in the United States.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] harderian729@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Good! The more immigration the better!

I only wish we could have a stipulation that additional immigrants must live outside of major cities, so they can help revitalize America's dying towns.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Oh we have a similar policy to that in Australia, it’s fucking awful.

New migrants have to uproot their lives to spend 3 years living in dead end towns with zero job prospects, it’s a huge career killer and ensures immigrants have less opportunities to advance compared to other Australians. It’s also a negative in their ability to form social connections due to the lack of people, or get help from ethnic communities who can share their experiences and knowledge navigating a new country compared to their previous.

But hey some shitty rural workplaces like abattoirs fucking love the captive workforce to exploit.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

It would appear that humans, given the free choice, choose to live in cities. Forcing people to go where they’d rather not go is obviously going to be a negative.

Anytime you override people’s freedom to choose their own path, you make things worse.

[–] harderian729@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And I'm sure many of them choose it over their previous nations.

I don't get what you're trying to say here. It's better these immigrants don't get to immigrate?

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What I’m saying is pretty fucking obvious.

That forcing them to go to rural towns is bad.

[–] harderian729@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nobody is "forcing" them to go to rural towns.

They can choose to stay in their current nation or emigrate elsewhere if rural America is not good enough for them.

It's literally accepting people who otherwise would not be accepted.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wow you’re so generous!

How about simply letting them live like everyone else instead of making them second class citizens with less freedoms just because they want to immigrate?

[–] harderian729@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Because America's towns are still dying and this is a way to revitalize them.

If rural America isn't good enough for them, they can stay in their current nation or try to move to a different one.

The alternative would be them not having this option. This is literally nothing but gain.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The solution to dying towns isn’t to force people to go die in them as well.

The alternative would be to let people in without such stupid requirements.

[–] harderian729@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The solution to dying towns isn’t to force people to go die in them as well.

Literally not at all what I suggested.

Please argue in good faith if you want to be taken seriously by rational people.

The alternative would be to let people in without such stupid requirements.

If that's what you want, that's fine. I would prefer additional immigrants help restore America rather than leech off of it in a major city.

This discussion is over. You may have the last word.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

If America’s towns require human sacrifice in order to stay vital, they should die.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ooh, interesting immigration policy: you can immigrate, but only to a rural area.

[–] harderian729@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Rural America is better than a lot of places in the world.

I'm sure many immigrants would be ecstatic to have the opportunity.

[–] rhythmisaprancer@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I live in a rural town (1 hour+ drive in any drection to the next town) and I could see this being a good thing if implemented correctly. This town isn't equipped for an influx of any people, but has vacant lots that could be turned into a variety of housing. There aren't a lot of jobs, but I would think more people would mean more things could be offered. Potentially great way to invest in rural areas!

[–] harderian729@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Heck yeah! Remember, the alternative would be these immigrants being unable to immigrate to the US!

If they would prefer to stay outside of the US rather than live in rural America, nobody is forcing them to come!

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think we should force you to live in South Dakota, since it needs a little revitalizing.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seeing two of your comments now, I feel you have a bit of a bee in your bonnet about immigrants being forced to live places?

Care to share more? I don't mean to pre-judge you, I just feel there's more behind your feelings on the matter than I understand yet.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How about, and this might be a little crazy, not forcing people to live somewhere?

[–] harderian729@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're right. They can just stay in their current nations if they don't want to move to rural America.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think forcing immigrants to live in bumfuck nowhere places because you like those places is stupid. You don't even have an actual argument for it. I think metal music and manual cars should be more popular, so let's force immigrants to only listen to metal and only drive manual vehicles lol.

Are you also gonna claim that you're pro-freedom and pro-small government while forcing people to live in your backwater hometown?

[–] harderian729@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You still can't comprehend what you are reading and I'm done repeating myself.

Goodbye.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

The level of dialog I expect from a hillbilly smh

I was being genuine and said nothing about forcing people. It's an option to consider, but not one you will see when you lack compassion.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I imagine they would; alas it gets a lot more complicated than that.

I'd like to see a renewed love for rural places generally, and especially in the developing world. There's so much potential there that I feel most people don't see.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What better way to open people’s eyes to the beauty of X, than to force X upon them!

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay I saw this and first thought it was a reply to another thread about XWindows and exTwitter.

I'd like to see a renewed love of rural places - not by forcing people to live there.


But in this thread's hypothetical of immigration to rural parts, there's a difference that it's an invitation: you're invited to come to our country to live in certain areas. It's only "forcing X" if you think you're already entitled to immigrate.

Like, easing immigration for "skilled workers" isn't forcing anyone to be a "skilled worker".

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

People having to live in certain places aren’t being offered immigration. Immigration means becoming a citizen. Citizens of the United States are free.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

That's a fair, and important point, I think. Though I only half agree. Gaining residency also counts as immigration, does it not? At least it's a step in the way to full residency; and those steps do come with a limited freedom.

[–] SmokumJoe@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

If you're white

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The most beautiful and vital thing about America is freedom. If you cut that down, like by forcing people to live in a particular place, to revitalize something else, you’ve gone downhill.

[–] harderian729@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Ok. They can just stay in their current countries.