this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
176 points (97.8% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2603 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Just those who joined a literal terrorist cell I’d say. It’s not their fault, but giving brainwashed, radicalized religious zealots citizenship in the very societies they left to destroy is even more wrong. And while we shield children from most consequences, some things are too heinous to forgive like that.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Its not about giving her citizenship, she already had it from birth but had it stripped away under the pretence that she could get Bangladeshi citizenship (which they dispute). This is essentially the UK trying to dump its problems elsewhere and setting the awful precedent that if you have recent ancestors with another nationality you can be stripped of the one you were born with.

By all means punish her, lock her up for 30 years for all I care, but trying to pretend she isn't British and foisting the problem elsewhere is disgusting.

[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The Daily Telegraph reported that Begum had developed a reputation as an enforcer amongst other members of IS and had tried to recruit other young women to join the group.

I’m having a hard time working up any sympathy honestly.

She’s a citizen of the caliphate or whatever now?

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't see any need for sympathy for her, as I said lock her up for however long is appropriate. The problem is the UK trying to dump its problem citizens on other countries and setting a dangerous precedent for stripping away peoples citizenship and potentially leaving them stateless (which is against all sorts of international agreements)

[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol 0 points 8 months ago

This seems hardly like a recurring theme. But clearly seems legal under british law.

Seems like she can and should be tried in Syria.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry so much, I am sure Allah will provide for her in the refugee came she helped create.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Its sad that bigots like you cant read the either of the times where I said I dont have sympathy for her and would have no problem with her being put in jail for what she did. Somehow I get the feeling their wouldnt be this same lust for stripping someone of their citizenship of birth if her mum was French.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

I find it sad that bigots like you don't respect Islam.

[–] livus@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@GregorGizeh

giving brainwashed, radicalized religious zealots citizenship in the very societies they left to destroy is even more wrong

I can't work out which side you're arguing for here. A British citizen went to Syria to attack Syrians.

Britain then made the Syrians pay for her upkeep. At one point the Syrians specifically the Kurds were being forced to pay for the upkeep of hundreds of Westerners who had come to kill them. It's really messed up.

She should be in a British jail.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I suppose I am just generally in disagreement with the concept that anyone has to be responsible for enemies of their host society.

Exiling people who harm or oppose the community in a dangerous way has been a reasonable and accepted practice since forever. For that matter, I would love to exile our German fascist supporters to Russia so they can die for the führer they so idolize. These people are technically brainwashed too, victims of Russian disinformation campaigns. Does that absolve them from responsibility? No.

To return to the original example: If they want to join a religious terrorist group, alright, but then they are that group's responsibility. If that group are just stateless, disorganized fanatics that couldn’t possibly provide a good way of life for anyone even if they had the resources, that’s not anyone’s problem but their own.

There are some things that are not forgivable in my opinion, one of them is to set out to actively participate in a religious terror campaign. Why should any other society be responsible for them?

[–] ralphio@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well in your scenario she would become the problem of Syria, and whatever you think of the Asaad regime there's a reason these types of exiles are not accepted under international law. When a large county uses a smaller society as its de facto prison it doesn't tend to work out too well for the natives (see Australia), so it's just not allowed in principle. In reality the British are trying to say it's Bangladesh's problem since her parents are from there which doesn't really make sense.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

see Australia

Interesting that a British prison colony has become at least (if not more) civilized than their jailers...

[–] livus@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

@GregorGizeh thanks for this comment. I do understand your perspective now and you've explained it well.

I think you and I just have some different principles. For you, if someone breaks the social contract then they lose some of their human rights. For me, they don't, human righs are inalienable, and importantly that person also remains the responsibility of the society that produced them.

I acknowledge that human rights are a modern concept and as you point out, making people stateless/exiling has a ling tradition in human history. So are a lot of things I disagree with, though.

Thanks for the exchange of ideas.