this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
324 points (94.5% liked)

Science Memes

10950 readers
1998 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 8 months ago (4 children)

5500C? i thought it's not that much, chemistry can get you there

apparently not

thermite tops at some 2000C-something, and in any case can't work above boiling point of aluminum (2470C)

only in few cases of adiabatic flame temperatures reach above 4000C, and all in oxygen. highest listed in wikipedia is oxygen/dicyanoacetylene at 4990C. maybe some wacky highly fluorinated oxidizer will allow for even higher temperatures. adiabatic detonation temperatures also top out at some 4500C even for the most energetic explosives

so really only practical way to get to 5500C is through use of electric arc

[–] kbal@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

adiabatic detonation temperatures also top out at some 4500C even for the most energetic explosives

What if we pre-heat the room to 3000, then very quickly introduce the explosives and run away before detonation?

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 8 months ago

if there's no room left after measurement, did it really happen?

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

5 trillion K is a lot more than 5500 C.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He's talking about the surface of the sun

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Oh, in the picture. I haven't realised it's a part of the parent comment, only read the text.

Makes way more sense then.

[–] HeckGazer@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Surely a laser would be way more practical

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 8 months ago

depends on what do you want to heat up. hint: at 5500C you need to handle plasma anyway

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You're only off by about 9 zeros.