126
Typescript (programming.dev)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I have. Edit; I haven’t 🤣 didn’t see the .js at the end of that word so some of the following is probably irrelevant, though I’ll leave it because it took me a while to type it out. Haha

I’d probably be more interested in it if I were being forced by my day job to work in the JVM. I happen to be in a situation where I am my own boss working on projects completely alone and the tech I pick comes from months of wasting time making perfect the enemy of good. I know that raises quite a few red flags but I can’t help the way that they made me. Haha 🥴

From what I’ve gathered from Joseph Gordon Bell at the (IMO best software engineering podcast ever) Co-Recursive podcast, Scala sacrifices some of the purity and safety by its dependence on the the Java cargo cult. Partly, this is also a drawback of Purescript for me (since it’s intended to compile to JavaScript) but Purescript is starting to be able to escape that fate. Also, I’m a HUGE fan of Haskell syntax.

From your perspective, what pros and cons do you see if I were comparing Scala to Purescript?

Ps. The one that is actually really making me take notice lately is OCaml for the browser.

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
126 points (84.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

19198 readers
2655 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS