this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
130 points (98.5% liked)

Bicycles

3127 readers
9 users here now

Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] minnow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not about if the cyclist hit something, it's about the possibility of something hitting the bicyclist.

If a car, following the law, took its right of way through the intersection and hit a cyclist who wasn't following the law... Well it's fine to say the cyclist was at fault, but he's still been hit by a car.

Traffic laws are there to protect everyone from each other.

[โ€“] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Except, as others have pointed out in this discussion, it's actually safer to let cyclists use stop signs as yield signs.