this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
217 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

31882 readers
644 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kory@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well, I have, have you?

From their website: Legal Assistance and General Information

For legal assistance requests, general questions, or miscellaneous queries: info@eff.org info@eff.org PGP public key GPG Key Fingerprint: F2F2 1BB8 531E 9DC3 0D40 F68B 11A1 A9C8 4B18 732F Signal Number (text only): 510-243-8020. To verify it's us, you can check the safety numbers for the conversation. Either the first half or the second half of the safety numbers should read one of the following:35593 90536 26981 58470 03363 72867 or 38948 48795 16727 63104 76636 96731.

[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Look up their MX records : Microsoft email

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

In true EFF fashion. Their second server / backup MX is hosted at some other smaller company so things could be worse, at least their MX as a non Microsoft alternative.

Either way I can get this, they most likely have hundreds of people using Microsoft products, like Office 365, and Outlook's compatibility with IMAP is a joke. They most likely also don't want to run a serious in-house email infraestruture capable of handling that load. All reasons might have driven them to Microsoft / O365.

This is usually what happens, when your company is big you can't make it with open-source without tons of extra costs and complexities. Sad but true.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hell, even SMB really can't easily/cost-effectively run without MS.

Sad, but true.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Unfortunately it can't either be run in a solid and stable way EVEN with MS. The Windows' SMB client sucks as well.