Selfhosted

40041 readers

657 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

262

Broadcom yanks ESXi Free version, effective immediately (kb.vmware.com)

submitted 9 months ago by kalpol@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'd expected this but it still sucks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

If you're already running windows, hyper-v. theres proxmox, and tons of others. So they are mistaken. 🤣

[–] CazRaX@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They mean that they aren't offering another solution.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

I know, but this is the way I read it when they claim to give no option.

[+] TheHolm@aussie.zone -9 points 9 months ago (5 children)

All of them not equate in same league. Do you know any type 1 free supervises out there? Xen probably.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Proxmox, Xen, hyper-v are all considered type 1 as far as I'm aware.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 months ago

Proxmox

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

KVM makes proxmox type 1

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I assume what you're looking for specifically here is a complete platform that you can install on bare-metal, not just the actual hypervisor itself. In which case consider any of these:

Proxmox
XCP-NG
Windows Hyper-V Server Core (basically Windows Server Nano with Hyper-V)
Any Linux distro running KVM/QEMU - Add Cockpit if you need a web interface, or use Virt-Manager, either directly or over X-forwarding

[–] Anarch157a@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Any Linux distro running KVM/QEMU - Add Cockpit if you need a web interface, or use Virt-Manager, either directly or over X-forwarding

No need for X forwarding, you can connect Virt-Manager to a remote system that has libvirt,

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

This is true, but not everyone gets to use a linux system as their main desktop at work. I'm not aware of a windows version of virt-manager, but if that exists it would be fucking rad.

[–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why you're getting down voted, you're right. I'm not sure if anyone would run Proxmox for their enterprise hypervisor? I mean HyperV is okay. Slim pickings for big orgs. I know there's Nutanix, but most folks are moving to the big three for VMs and hosting.

[–] ssdfsdf3488sd@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I am running proxmox at a moderately sized corp. The lack of a real support contract almost kills it, which is too bad because it is a decent product