this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
613 points (98.1% liked)

Open Source

31145 readers
328 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It comes with a 3.5mm audio output for starters.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There are $10 adapters that convert USB-C to a 3.5 mm port, if that is critical. Or just get any of the wide variety of Bluetooth devices on the market.

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A 3.5mm jack costs fractions of a cent, and I don't have to carry around a $10 dollar adapter to solve an artificial problem.

Bluetooth sucks badly, and the wide array of devices on the market have batteries that need to be charged. I'll stick with the best option if i can thanks, 3.5mm jack.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Okay, but in exchange you're carrying around a $250 device that is much large than the adapter? That was my point. And for many people, myself included, Bluetooth devices do decently well even if they have their drawbacks.

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Fair enough. I guess my point is that a modern phone should have both Bluetooth AND a 3.5mm jack.