197
submitted 7 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 50 points 7 months ago

Imagine having a King in 2024

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"these inbred, pedophilic, half alive cretins are your monarchy! They are your betters, bow to them and pay their bills!"

It is absolutely moronic that we haven't dragged every king on earth off his throne, made them private citizens and kicked them off the government payroll

Edit: for anyone downvoting, my comment was light. What I actually believe is that once they are dragged them off the throne, they should be executed and tossed in the river. But I know that's a bit far for 2024

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

But I know that's a bit far for 2024

Thats polluting the river bro!

Compost the wealthy.

[-] rammer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

I might have a modest proposal for you.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Better to compost the poor.

[-] gnutrino@programming.dev 11 points 7 months ago

We tried that once, their replacement cancelled Christmas and invaded Ireland...

[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

The far bigger issue is land owners in general.

Targetting the Royal family and them alone will solve nothing. I'm pretty sure all their land money goes to the state anyway doesn't it?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

They're pretty much the American military of landowners, in that they own more land than the next 10+ biggest land owners combined.

And no, I'm pretty sure that the majority of the income from their.. mimes big bosoms vast tracts of land goes to them rather than the country as a whole. They're one of the biggest public funds black holes in the world, just like the aforementioned military.

You could feed, clothe and house every person in the UK for the rest of their lives with just a fraction of the land and riches that the royal leeches are hoarding.

[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee -2 points 7 months ago

There no point having a conversation if you are going to outright make things up.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

And what is it you think I'm making up?

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You forgot "God save the King!" at the end of that.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago
[-] intrepid@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

We did that with some of them. But there are also a lot of 'royalists' out there.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 19 points 7 months ago

Still more respectable than the previous US President that people actually chose.

[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago
[-] rammer@sopuli.xyz 9 points 7 months ago

Be quiet! You bloody peasant!

(Monty Python reference)

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Now we see the violence inherent in the system!

[-] HigHurtenflurst@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 7 months ago

Help! Help! I'm being repressed!

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

There's a lot of that going on at the moment lol

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago

I can’t speak from the British Commonwealth perspective, but from a Swedish perspective my opinion is this regarding having a monarch:

Yeah, it might not reflect our modern values well, but since the (Swedish) monarch is mostly ceremonial and completely unpolitical, there’s actually quite little to hate about it. They’re just the mascot of the country. There’s far more pressing issues in our country than having that confused old guy as head of state.

At least he doesn’t possess nuclear launch codes.

[-] sugartits@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

there’s actually quite little to hate about it

Where does their money come from?

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 4 points 7 months ago

I don't know about Sweden, but the UK monarch is an aristocrat that owns loads of land, businesses, trusts, etc, and his money comes from that. At least, he gets to keep about a quarter of it; the rest goes to the Government.

[-] rammer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 7 months ago

In Sweden that might be true. But in the UK the monarch has some vestigial power. Even though everyone assures that if he ever tried to actually use those powers they would be taken away. But it doesn't change the fact that in the UK the monarch still has power.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Let's see where we're at after November before we start shit talking too much.
There's a very high chance that if Trump wins, he'll make himself a monarch

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

It won’t be long before he suffers a cheeseburger induced heart attack

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Better to have a king than a Trump or Bush.

[-] GhostFence@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago
[-] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

And he didn't do much except for talking. The only real fuck up was Liz Truss, but she was gone in no time.

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
197 points (90.9% liked)

World News

38583 readers
2462 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS