this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
1052 points (98.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

32430 readers
1089 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If you're using C++, why not use streams?

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Well, that means that it's also a C++ thing, but streams are an even slicker concept that aren't a C thing, making higher-level code look nice and shiny - and abstracting away loads of I/O pain points while encapsulating useful features.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

C++ streams are ugly in their own right, but C++ preferred practice these days is to treat it as its own language rather than as a C superset. That is, lots of crufty old C stuff still works in C++ for legacy reasons, but using it when you don't have to is considered inappropriate.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, streams are old and crusty and horrific on the inside (don't ask about the time I implemented a socket layer with streams), but still less clunky than the C standard library (unless you're really into being a memory Nazi).

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wasn't personally using C++, I was using relatively modern C which has had an homegrown object system added to it.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Then it's not C++. And probably an even bigger mess.