Linux

48081 readers

796 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Possible virus?(Firefox) (lemmy.ml)

submitted 9 months ago by Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I opened firefox After about an hour of the system being in standby and in theSponsored Links row there were 2 new entries

http:/ /bom07s30-in-x03. 1e100. net/ (I dismantled the URLs to prevent accidental clicks)

pnbomb-ac-in-x0e.1e100

I right clicked and searched in Google and it showed up as this

pnbomb-ac-in-x0e.1e100 Sponsored it disappeared after a while, just to be sure I ran sudo lsof -i and noticed firefox was connected to this url

maa05s15-in-x03.1e100.net

I am not sure if am infected or this is just a glitch(I obviously didn't click on the links)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Antivirus programs are generally the go-to method...

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Note that anti-virus can only assert that you are infected, not the opposite.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're saying even if you're not confirmed as infected, you're not necessarily confirmed as not being infected. In other words, you're talking about false positives.

Am I understanding you correctly?

[–] NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The opposite. Not found negatives. Anti-virus software can only tell you that it didn't find a virus, not that there aren't any.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, what you just said is what I said I thought you said. (@_@)

We're on the same page; it's just that wording is hard.

Also, you all were right; I was wrong. Admission given. 👍

[–] Suspiciousbrowsing@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you're on the same page, but mean false negatives not false positive.
False negatives being the potential that you have the virus, but the scanner wasn't able to identify it so returned a "you're all clean" when in fact, you've got a dirty virus and should have listened in health class.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah.

Like I said, words are hard. Lol.