Privacy

31882 readers

608 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

776

Mozilla says Apple’s new browser rules are “as painful as possible” for Firefox (www.theverge.com)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mozilla is unhappy because the use of browser engines other than WebKit will be restricted to the EU, forcing them to develop two different apps.

For an independent browser like Firefox, managing two browsers is not easy, so it can be forgiven that this could be seen as almost harassment.

Also, the fact that the use of browser engines other than WebKit is limited to iOS means that the use of WebKit is still forced on iPadOS, which also increases the effort for Mozilla.

Source: https://iphonewired.com/news/746093/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Are these customers donating, or purchasing mozilla products or services so that mozilla doesn't have to rely on google's donations?

I'm confused what you're trying to say here.

Are you saying that Google has more of a right to dictate what Mozilla does because Google gives Mozilla the most money?

Are you saying Google told Mozilla to work on things other than Firefox with the money they were given?

Why bring up Google at all?

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

Telemitry is way more useful than you think, because the loudest are not always right. Same for donations.

[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because much of mozilla's funding is from a deal with google, that's why.

US$300 million annually. Approximately 90% of Mozilla's royalties revenue for 2014 was derived from this contract

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Foundation

A lot of money, but not enough to actually to actually do a lot. They keep cutting features their "customers" like. Why?

Because development is expensive.

Google props mozilla up to pretend they don't have a monopoly on the internet. Just enough money to barely keep up, not enough to truly stay competitive.

Mozilla wants to not rely on google money, so they are trying to expand their products. AI is overhyped, but still useful, and something worth investing in.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I know that, but why did you bring it up in order to contrast it with Mozilla's consumer base? Do you mean to say that Google is the actual paying customer?

It seems like such a bizarre thing to bring up at all.