this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3134 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
0
OpenAI being Sued for "Stealing" Peoples Content Online (www.firstpost.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

OpenAI's ChatGPT and Sam Altman are in massive trouble. OpenAI is getting sued in the US for illegally using content from the internet to train their LLM or large language models

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wander@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you release code under gpl, and I modify it, I'm required to release those modifications publicly under gpl as well.

[–] inspxtr@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

so if content is under GPL and used for training data, how far is the process of training/fine-tuning considered “modification”? For example, if I scrape a bunch of blog posts and just try to use tools to analyze the language, does that considered “modification”? What is the minimum solution that OpenAI should do (or should have done) here, does it stop at making the code for processing the data public, or the entire code base?