this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
4694 points (97.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

57360 readers
611 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheLurker@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I just want to point out to anyone who thinks this is a viable legal defence, It isn't.

You would be considered to be stealing from the rights holder. The rights holder authorises your use of their property when you pay the license fee. If you don't pay the license fee you are considered to be stealing their property.

Just to be clear, I agree with the sentiment of this post. Legally speaking though, this defence would be cut down in moments.

[–] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 5 points 2 years ago

I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding is that I'm the US at least, it's still not theft, but copyright infringement, which also means it doesn't get handled in criminal court, but is instead handled as a civil lawsuit.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I just want to point out to anyone who thinks this is a viable legal defence, It isn’t.

Of course it isn't. Copyright laws were written by the same kind of people who decided that corporations gets to "people."

[–] Aurix@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Of course it is no viable defense, but stealing is the wrong term, because stealing is used for the theft of physical goods missing somewhere else. This would be along illegal usage semantically, or as another comment pointed out copyright infringement.

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 2 points 2 years ago

Legally speaking they're not going after you solely for piracy pretty much ever, at least not in America, unless you're making a profit from it.