1151
submitted 8 months ago by Sammy@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I feel like I've been gaslit into running FOSS but every success only brings me closer to fighting god

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] piracysails@lemm.ee 32 points 8 months ago

If you ever get bored of Ubuntu. You could try fedora kde, the recent versions are so good.

Don't forget to install codecs though.

[-] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago

That's exactly what I did haha, started with Kubuntu and moved to Fedora

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

I run Kubuntu on my desktop and laptop machines but I'm seriously considering switching to Debian (which I run on my server). Any reason I wouldn't want to do that on my desktop or laptop?

(Previously I ran Slackware on everything, so both of them feel like gliding softly on a cloud to me.)

[-] gayhitler420@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

There’s no reason. I switched to Debian after leaving Slackware around the reiser4 time. It’s real good.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah it seems to work very well on my server. I've always just wondered why I don't see more people recommending it when they're switching from Ubuntu/Kubuntu. From what I've seen on the server (which I mostly access remotely), it seems decent.

[-] gayhitler420@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

It’s not cool. It means you have gray hairs. The packages are old by default.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Well I do have some gray hairs, so no issue there...

[-] gayhitler420@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

May I recommend lxqt and a trackball?

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

lol Listen here, sonny...

[-] Hapbt@mastodon.social 0 points 8 months ago

@limelight79 @gayhitler420 my only real nitpick with debian is that the package updates are too slow for my personal taste. for other people, maybe its perfect, but i think ubuntu has just a bit more bleeding edge without being unstable.
my 2 cents
ymmv

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Hmm interesting point, thanks. That's the sort of thing I might not have noticed since I don't use it on an interactive system like my desktop.

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

You probably will not notice that you are in other distro when you start using Debian. They are the same in most things, but without Snaps and most propietary stuff (by default. But if you really need propietary things, you may see the official non-free sourcelist)

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Thanks. I often wonder why I don't see people recommending Debian as a potential destination from Ubuntu/Kubuntu. Why not go to the Free source?

[-] RuikkaaPrus@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I really do not know. But what I can say for sure is that during the installation of Debian, it allows you to choose the desktop environment at installation time, so you can have your Debian with KDE at minute 0 after installing it.

On the other hand, remember that Kubuntu is derived from Ubuntu. I don't see Ubuntu fans very enthusiastic about creating another Debian-based distro with KDE preinstalled when they even offer it (live images) to you here.

[-] Swarfega@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Weird. I've been trying to find a distro I'm happy with and was setting Fedora KDE up today. Ran though my bookmarks and found no videos played on Twitch. Had to install codecs to get it to work. I hadn't seen this in previous distros. Is this specific to Fedora? Other than this hiccup I've enjoyed it so far.

I liked how straight forward Linux Mint is but prefer KDE Plasma. Plus Mint seems quite far behind in versions.

[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In their gnome version, during the setup process (first boot, not install), they would prompt for third-party repo and codec (Enabled by default, IIRC).

I think you might have unchecked that? or KDE not offering such experience?


EDIT: NVM, I just checked, and I have never installed the codecs... LOL.

Fedora is notorious for avoiding shipping proprietary software with their distro even at the cost of new users.

I think this might stems from the fact that fedora used to be a distro aimed for advanced users. It is slowly getting better at being new user friendly.

[-] MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org 5 points 8 months ago

I wonder if it is notorious?

Do most Linux users (in this context we'll say people who specifically choose to use Linux and by extension chose a specific distribution) look unfavorably on proprietary software being excluded by default?

For me, I prefer it so I don't see it that way. But it is also an extra step and an annoyance if you want things to "just work". Which is an understandable position.

Food for thought, I guess.

[-] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago

I'd like it if they weren't necessary and everything was AV1, then I would be alright with the codecs being omitted by default without any simple way to install them.

Similarly with the NVIDIA proprietary driver, NVIDIA actually recommend installing the driver through the package provided through your distro on thier download page

[-] piracysails@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

It is definitely not, at least for me when I switched to Linux.

I noticed weird issues while watching a video through VLC, posted about it on Reddit and someone suggested that I had not installed the codecs.

[-] Swarfega@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I don't recall seeing that and installed it about four times.

[-] piracysails@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Haha the pain of finding out...

Didn't you notice the decreased quality?

[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I was wondering why I have desync issues couple days ago watching videos with my wife.

Modern YouTube videos are generally fine, but many other site has poor support for popular codecs.

[-] Goodman@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah those codecs always get you.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Save the pain and install Nobara.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Save the pain and install Nobara.

I mean, it's one dropdown/checkbox click, to enable codecs sources. I get your point though, having to remember to enable that.

I'd used Nobara if I knew it was being supported by more than just one (great/special; I'm aware of his contribution to gaming on Linux) guy (please correct me if this is no longer the case?), since it would be installed on my daily driver box, and it's important for me to have a high level of reliability, even though I do more gaming tasks than non-gaming tasks on it.

I'm aware that Nobara is based from Fedora, but am nervous about having a single point of failure, support wise.

[-] Swarfega@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I started this way today but kept coming up with an error with rsync during install. I tried in Virtual Box and had the same error. I gave up and just installed Fedora in the end.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

No clue what rsync would be doing. Maybe there's an issue with the current ISO, but I've installed it on a few systems in the last couple months with no issues.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

You could try fedora kde

I love me some Fedora with KDE, and looking forward to the next major version of KDE.

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

How do I install codecs? I'm running Ubuntu and I don't have the option to encode in H.265, which I could do on Windows.

[-] piracysails@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I fas as I am aware, Ubuntu ships codecs by default.

Fedora does not ship proprietary software due to license issues.

*This is just what I know, you should fact check both.

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
1151 points (97.7% liked)

Linux

47371 readers
881 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS