But if you think that it's reasonable for someone to own a house where they work, where they originally were from, and where they want to vacation, then quite frankly I don't think we are ever going to see eye to eye.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But if you think that it’s reasonable for someone to own a house where they work, where they originally were from, and where they want to vacation, then quite frankly I don’t think we are ever going to see eye to eye.

I think there's an "OR" there, not an "AND". Or are you refusing to see eye to eye with someone who buys a house somewhere because their career moved, then chooses to keep the old one because they were able to rent it? If that's the case, why?

Also, if it could conclusively be shown that keeping people from having a second home wouldn't affect homelessness (which I suspect is true), would you still want to prevent ownership of a second home? If so, why? Just want to stick it to the middle class?

I'm sorry, but considering the top 1% has more than twice wealth of the entire bottom 99% combined, it seems counterintuitive to pass radical reforms that have a larger effect on the lower 99% than the top 1%.

I mean, if I were filthy rich and that kind of thing passed, I would just deed out a single plot of land with a 100-mile or more strip between two 100-acre squares (probably work with other 1%ers to have a co-op of that thin strip of land) and I'd get away with having as many houses as I wanted.

But someone like you or me finds a good price on a little 800sqft second house close to work saving time, money, and environment on commuting? Banned?

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

are you refusing to see eye to eye with someone who buys a house somewhere because their career moved, then chooses to keep the old one because they were able to rent it?

Yes.

If that’s the case, why?

I will kindly direct you to my very first comment in this thread. Cheers.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I will kindly direct you to my very first comment in this thread. Cheers.

Your first comment did not include a "why". But you also don't seem to want to engage. Just throwing out a horrific idea on purpose to troll? I think I'm going to presume you're acting with self-awareness because I don't want to insult your intelligence.

So you do you. I'm out. Not like what you're suggesting will ever happen for people to lose sleep over it.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago

People who have different world views than you are not automatically trolls. You'd do well to consider that.

[–] Sternout@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

What about vacation homes? They are quite common in countries that used to be in the soviet block.

Or mountain huts