this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
836 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
3307 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Hey guys, I'm sure Meta's intentions with the fediverse are pure though! Really!

[–] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are a lot of people who are not against federating with Threads.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, who's saying they believe Meta's intentions are pure?

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Prole believes those are the same thing.

Meta doesn't get any real data from federating Threads that they can't get right now by just running a web scraper over it. Most of the dire worries presented are either not something they could actually do (like forcing ads on other instances), are things individual users could just block the instance to avoid, or are things that could be resolved by just defederating them later if they seem to be going down that road.

The biggest realistic threat is probably an Eternal September 2.0 scenario, but that is going to happen if and when Lemmy becomes popular.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I was going to say I knew all that and was poking to make it clear to others that literally no one is saying that but then you hit me with "Eternal September 2.0 scenario" haha.

I'll have to do a little searching on that one.

Edit: Ah, I had forgotten.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Edit: Ah, I had forgotten.

Wow, that sets the Wayback Machine to high.

Heh, no, not that one. This one.

[–] wikibot@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Here's the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

Eternal September or the September that never ended is Usenet slang for a period beginning around 1993 when Internet service providers began offering Usenet access to many new users. The flood of new users overwhelmed the existing culture for online forums and the ability to enforce existing norms. AOL followed with their Usenet gateway service in March 1994, leading to a constant stream of new users. Hence, from the early Usenet point of view, the influx of new users in September 1993 never ended.

^to^ ^opt^ ^out^^,^ ^pm^ ^me^ ^'optout'.^ ^article^ ^|^ ^about^

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Meta, probably

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

I mean, pure? No. But also not at all linked to this topic. They can get fediverse data whether or not they are federated.