97
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by downpunxx@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DanseMacabre@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Threads being in the Fediverse is a plus for me, not a negative. It means I could follow regular people and friends who would never in a million years join places like Mastodon or Lemmy while I still get the benefits of being on those platforms, all while being shielded from Meta’s ads and data harvesting. The only issue is I don’t actually believe Zuck will go through with it. They’ll either never federate or severely limit it if they do.

Mastodon themselves have put out a post outlining how this will affect them (it won’t) and how EEE is not a threat. If Meta does eventually opt out of ActivityPub then cool. It’s not like that’s why Mastodon users were there in the first place.

[-] lazyvar@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mastodon the non-profit is all but compromised.

The guy in charge is essentially in cahoots with Meta and is under an NDA from them.

It doesn’t take more than 2 seconds of thinking to see how empty the words are that Mastodon is not at risk.

  1. Threads federates with Mastodon instances
  2. Threads uses its massive engineering resources to implement proprietary functionality that’s incompatible with Mastodon instances
  3. A non-trivial number of Mastodon users jump over to Threads, this is the first wave of people that leave Mastodon
  4. Threads drops support for federation and silos itself off
  5. The majority of the remainder of people on Mastodon jump over to Threads because they want to be able to continue to interact with the people that jumped over to Threads and/or because they want to be able to continue to interact with normies now that they’re used to that
  6. Mastodon is effectively dead, safe for a select few that stick to their guns

3 and 5 will happen in a cascading manner, the more people switch to Threads, the more others will also want to switch.

[-] menemen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Embrace, extend and destroy is a known, well established, concept. Microsoft was quite open about how this is to be done.

It has already happened to established decentralised networks. See here!

Maybe it won't happen to Mastodon, maybe they have the masterminds who can counter it. But it is imo pretty clear that this is what Meta plans to do.

[-] GONADS125@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Read their privacy policy. They already admitted they will scrape info from 3rd party users/communities which interact with their users.

This is not a good thing.

[-] smokinjoe@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I swear some of y'all just get off on doomsaying.

[-] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Do you think Facebook wants to get involved because they're excited about making the fediverse a better place?

[-] btmoo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

No, they want to train AI models. They don't give a shit about taking over ActivityPub.

[-] Yoz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Omg please get yourself educated. Really scary to know people like you exist.

[-] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The post has been put out by the people that made Mastodon. Why should anyone trust you over them when you provide 0 arguments against them.

Embrace Extend Extinguish was always a Microsoft strategy and one they have been forced to abandon over the years. Their attitude changed towards open source because it doesn't work! I think you might be the one who is lacking in knowledge or "education" here.

[-] Yoz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[-] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

What's your question? Microsoft invented and then abandoned the EEE strategy because the strategy dosen't work! Open source never went away no matter what they did.

[-] Zoot@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

Open source doesnt work? Would love to see a source on that one alone. Almost sounds like you have an agenda to sell.

[-] furikuri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think you misinterpreted what they said. They meant "Their attitude changed towards open source because [Embrace, Extend, Extinguish] doesn't work"

[-] areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what I meant! Did I fail to write it clearly or is their reading comprehension no good?

[-] Sunforged@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had to read it twice because I misinterpreted it the same way.

Their attitude changed towards open source because it doesn’t work!

That "it" could be interpreted either as 'open source' or 'EEE' from the previous sentence.

[-] furikuri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The sentence itself is a little ambiguous but it's nothing major, it's easy enough to get the message from context

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
97 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

58165 readers
3526 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS