Technology

59243 readers

3375 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

190

submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Screens keep getting faster. Can you even tell? | CES saw the launch of several 360Hz and even 480Hz OLED monitors. Are manufacturers stuck in a questionable spec war, or are we one day going to wo...::CES saw the launch of several 360Hz and even 480Hz OLED monitors. Are manufacturers stuck in a questionable spec war, or are we one day going to wonder how we ever put up with ‘only’ 240Hz displays?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't need or want a phone over 90hz, and a pc screen over 180hz. A phone is a waste of battery and a pc screen over that is a waste of money.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Then don't buy them? With better screens coming out the ones you do want to buy get cheaper.

Back in the day 144hz screens cost a premium, now you can have them for cheap.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I stopped buying tvs from 2000 until like two years ago, when i saw them on sale for like $200. Been living off of projectors & a home server. I skipped so many "innovations" like curve, flat, HD, 4K, trueColor.

Weird that it has a OS and that was a shocker.

I look forward to what TVs bring in 2040.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean OLEDs are damn amazing image quality wise, but I'm also not a fan of "smart" TVs. The apps can be useful (like native Netflix, Amazon video and so on), but 90% of the time I use my PC over HDMI.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

I use my chromecast dongle for my smart TV. My smart TV will never get to have an internet connection.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You know what's hot? 3D televisions!!

I'm so glad that hype died out with people understanding it was stupid. Just thinking about all the ones who bought one.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

They're easy to identify, they all have curved screens now.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say I wanted them disallowed from being made. Just that it's dumb to buy them.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think there's an argument to make screens faster. Graphics have hit a point where resolution isn't going to give anything of substance... It's now more about making lighting work "right" with ray tracing... I think the next thing might be making things as fluid as possible.

So at least in the gaming space, these higher refresh rates make sense. There's still fluidity that we as humans can notice that we're not yet getting. e.g. if you shake your mouse like crazy, even on a 144hz the mouse will jump around to different spots it's not a fluid motion (I've never seen a 180hz but I bet the same applies).

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 10 months ago

You can see it moving a mouse super quick on a static background, but I never notice it happening in games. There's probably something there a touch noticeable in some fps online games if you really paid attention and could lock your max fps at 120fps with a 240hz monitor, but that would be about it, and I don't competitively play fps games. I'm perfectly happy with running 60fps at 120hz for myself.