Technology

59243 readers

3428 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

190

submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Screens keep getting faster. Can you even tell? | CES saw the launch of several 360Hz and even 480Hz OLED monitors. Are manufacturers stuck in a questionable spec war, or are we one day going to wo...::CES saw the launch of several 360Hz and even 480Hz OLED monitors. Are manufacturers stuck in a questionable spec war, or are we one day going to wonder how we ever put up with ‘only’ 240Hz displays?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Snoopey@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

All I want is a 27/28 inch oled 4k monitor with good hdr. I don't care about the refresh rate as long a it's 60Hz+

[–] dai@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Minimum for me would be 120hz, i've been using 120hz since 2012 (12 years... man) and anything less feels like a massive step backwards. My old S10+ and my cheapie laptop feel sluggish in any animated / transmission scenario.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I'm sticking out with IPS until MicroLED matures enough for me to afford.

OLED was never designed to be used as a computer monitor and I don't want a monitor that only lasts a couple years.

Researchers just designed a special two layer (thicker than current OLED) that doubles the lifespan to 10,000hours at 50% brightness without degrading.

I'm totally with you on good HDR though. When it works, it's as night -and-day as 60 -> 144hz felt for me.

[–] Snoopey@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Burn in is a non-issue for regular all-day use. As long as you aren't displaying a static image at 100% for literally years and actively stopping the screen from running preventative measures, you'll be fine.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 1 points 10 months ago

Can desktop computers do those preventative measures? I haven't seen any desktop interface for the mitigations Samsung puts on it's phones.

Desktops also display static images 100% of the time, unless you change your usage behavior to use full screen all the time.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why would oled only last 2 years?

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It doesn't only last for two years, however it begins to degrade after one year of illuminating blue. This would reduce the color accuracy.

However OLEDs are also very bad at color accuracy across it's brightness range. Typically at lower brightness their accuracy goes out the window.

This isn't as bad on smart phones ( smart phones also apply additional mitigations such as subpixel rotation) however desktop computers typically display static images for much longer and so not use these mitigations afaik.