120

what's the asshole mitigation plan? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by bobaduk@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world

184 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So far Lemmy is vibing. Everyone here is excited and optimistic and willing to put up with a few rough spots to be part of something.

When the Eternal September comes, which it will, how does a Lemmy instance deal with bad actors?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] oryx@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I think some bots are good. I could personally go without seeing the bots that reply to comments when something specific is said, but many subs had helpful bots in them.

[-] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

I am not into automatic memes. I do enjoy bots with specific callable functionality like looking up the Wiki, IMDB, whatever, or the reverse video bot.

I just don't want to see the "good bot" reply everytime a bot does something.

[-] MyMulligan@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

Correct me if I'm wrong but the whole 'good bot' thing was to help the bot to improve and moderators to remove bad bots? I'm easily wrong on this but that was my understanding. It helped with the pruning of bad bots and the growth of good ones.

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Something I enjoyed is how, during the rise of /r/transcribersofreddit transcribing image content into a comment, because of their standardised formatting, people often assumed they were a bot, so would comment "Good bot".

However, they were human posters, and this was often revealed by another bot that would look out for "good bot"/"bad bot" votes on (seemingly) human posts and say "are you sure [user] is a bot? Because I'm 97.84% sure they're not".

Eventually, it was common to see people replying to the image transcribers' comments with "Good human." and that always made me smile.