this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
1349 points (94.5% liked)

Fediverse

28499 readers
317 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just read this point in a comment and wanted to bring it to the spotlight.

Meta has practically unlimited resources. They will make access to the fediverse fast with their top tier servers.

As per my understanding this will make small instances less desirable to the common user. And the effects will be:

  1. Meta can and will unethically defedrate from instances which are a theat to them. Which the majority of the population won't care about, again making the small instances obsolete.
  2. When majority of the content is on the Meta servers they can and will provide fast access to it and unethically slow down access to the content from outside instances. This will be noticeable but cannot be proved, and in the end the common users just won't care. They will use Threads because its faster.

This is just what i could think of, there are many more ways to be evil. Meta has the best engineers in the world who will figure out more discrete and impactful ways to harm the small instances.

Privacy: I know they can scrape data from the fediverse right now. That's not a problem. The problem comes when they launch their own Android / iOS app and collect data about my search and what kind of Camel milk I like.

My thoughts: I think building our own userbase is better than federating with an evil corp. with unlimited resources and talent which they will use to destroy the federation just to get a few users.

I hope this post reaches the instance admins. The Cons outweigh the Pros in this case.

We couldn't get the people to use Signal. This is our chance to make a change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] root@aussie.zone 38 points 1 year ago (5 children)

On one hand, I think it could be possible that Meta is planning to federate with the fediverse with the ultimate goal of destroying it and replacing it with their own instances. Similar to what Google did with XMPP according to this article. https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

On the other hand, I also think it could be possible Meta is wanting to federate with the fediverse just so it can increase it's data collection many times quicker. Why manage servers when you can connect to other servers and suck up data as and when Threads users interact with other lemmy instances.

No idea which is more likely.

[–] voluble@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Interesting thoughts. I suppose Meta will collect what they want to collect, it's what they do, and this is all public discussion, anyone can collect it for any reason. And I don't doubt that their involvement in the fediverse is secretly nefarious in one way or another.

Where I think our current situation is different from the Google/XMPP thing, is that, a bunch of platforms are going down the tubes really quickly and lots of people are looking for the next thing all at the same time. It gives a lot of room for a good platform like this one to gain ground rapidly. As far as I'm concerned, if for example instagram federated, and I could browse some good feeds outside of meta's app & privacy permissions hell, that would be a plus for me. If they subsequently pulled what Google did with XMPP and suddenly backed out, I wouldn't react by moving to instagram exclusively and I can't really see why any user would make such a move.

[–] snap@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for the link about the whole google xmpp affair. Really well written. More people need to see this

[–] root@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

You're very welcome. I saw it in another post yesterday and have been sharing it where relevant.

[–] ijeff@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do think this sounds plausible. If they could become a dominant instance in the Fediverse, it would be easier to supplant it altogether. This is why decentralization is paramount.

[–] xaxl@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Threads will be the dominant instance by a huge margin.

We don't need them and they don't need us.

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn't Meta part of that as well with xmpp? They should not be trusted.

[–] root@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Not too sure if Meta was involved in the XMPP thing, but either way yes they shouldn't be trusted.

[–] MonsieurArchi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

nah zuckyfucky has always been about destroying competitors. It's not about data, it's about absolute dominance.

[–] root@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Like most big companies out there. Destroy competitors to be the main one that everyone has no choice but to go to.