this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
253 points (93.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43950 readers
727 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

OTOH, many people can't make heads from tails regarding windows, icons or buttons, and they don't get the contextual clues that the GUI gives for any operating system. They don't see them, and if they do they're unable to make the automatic inferences most of us long time users obtain from them. They act as people who are blind from birth and suddenly see, who have problems to understand tridimensionality; the GUI is not in their mind model of how to work with computers, and they have a lot of difficulty interacting with it.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is your point meant to be that these people who already have trouble learning GUIs would somehow have an easier time intuiting command line?

If that's correct, that's an absolutely BS argument

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is your point meant to be that these people who already have trouble learning GUIs would somehow have an easier time intuiting command line?

No, my point is that they're lost causes and they're untrainable.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

No, my point is that they’re lost causes and they’re untrainable.

Ah... I still don't get how that's meant to refute the previous person's point that elitism and the "git gud" attitude around Linux contributes to it's inability to become mainstream.

If anything your reply only reinforces their point, because you seem to be suggesting we throw anybody who struggles to learn it to the curb.

[–] Gh05t@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So that makes the “get good” advice valid? What are you talking about bro? I didn’t say Linux isn’t valid. I think you must have replied to me specifically on accident because your response isn’t germane to my reply. Or if you feel it is please explain. Make sure you use as many polysyllabic words as possible. I think you wrote up one of the Linux documents I’m to understand.

Or maybe I’ll just say: cool story bro.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So that makes the “get good” advice valid?

No, they're untrainable. It's literally impossible for them to get any good. At all.

[–] Gh05t@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Perfect. Good solution. Linux only for the elite.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

~~Linux~~ Computers only for the ~~elite~~ people willing to engage their brains.

FTFY

[–] Gh05t@beehaw.org 0 points 10 months ago

You have completely lost the plot. This topic is about Windows and Linux ease of use. I don’t know what you’re talking about anymore.