121
rule (lemmy.ml)
submitted 8 months ago by 0x2d@lemmy.ml to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

Looking at the specs, there are a lot of compromises, which probably explains some of that.

  • UFS 2.2 storage.
  • "only" 8GB RAM (the 16GB "extra" is just swap space).
  • 450 nits max brightness and "only" 60Hz.
  • Video on the rear camera maxes out at 2K@30fps. It hopefully can at least do 1080p@60, but seeing as even $500 phones are starting to get 4K@60, that's a dip.
  • 33W charging for that massive battery which even they say takes 4 hours to charge fully.
  • No WiFi 6.
  • Android 13 instead of 14 and I wouldn't hold my breath for more than one update.

It still looks pretty interesting, though, and if that $300 price tag lasts until it's actually available, I'm tempted to get one just to see what it can do.

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

196

16253 readers
2900 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS