this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

Capitalism in Decay

1282 readers
23 users here now

Fascism is capitalism in decay. As with anticommunism in general, the ruling class has oversimplified this phenomenon to the point of absurdity and teaches but a small fraction of its history. This is the spot for getting a serious understanding of it (from a more proletarian perspective) and collecting the facts that contemporary anticommunists are unlikely to discuss.

Posts should be relevant to either fascism or neofascism, otherwise they belong in !latestagecapitalism@lemmygrad.ml. If you are unsure if the subject matter is related to either, share it there instead. Off‐topic posts shall be removed.

No capitalist apologia or other anticommunism. No bigotry, including racism, misogyny, ableism, heterosexism, or xenophobia. Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome.

For our purposes, we consider early Shōwa Japan to be capitalism in decay.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Due to another user’s request, I have decided to compile threads on fascism, profascism, Japanese Imperialism, & neofascism here for your convenience. This compilation is, of course, incomplete, & its structure is subject to eventual change, but I hope that it suffices.

Origins

Economics

Culture

Foreign policy

Atrocities

Profascism

Legacy

Neofascism


Feel free to suggest any resources that you have in mind or how I could structure this thread better. Lastly, if you have any questions on fascism, profascism, parafascism (e.g. Japanese Imperialism), protofascism, or neofascism, you are welcome to ask me here or in private.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Is there a country that’s imperialist in the classical (pre-capitalist) sense?

No. By ‘classical’ I meant ‘standard’, but I see that I should have been more precise with my terminology.

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

"standard" as in the type practiced by the US, France and a few others (roughly, control through both finance capital and hands-on repression of resistance)?

[–] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Imperial America and France are neoimperialist, but a couple of centuries ago they were just imperialist.

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

so you're using "neoimperialism" to refer to what Lenin called imperialism?

[–] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 10 months ago

I see; I've never seen "neoimperialism" used as a synonym for neocolonialism elsewhere

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)