this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
106 points (93.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9682 readers
1150 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Phones, automatic transmission, so we have a free hand to use the phone, and huge dangerous roads built with no care for pedestrian safety.

It’s no single thing, but a mix of things that feed on each other, and create a terribly dangerous situation. 

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Also, huge truck and SUVs and the demand for them is ever increasing.

[–] zik@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Are phones also causing the simultaneous increase in cyclist deaths? Obviously not.

Or is the answer simpler than that - is it the rise of SUVs which don't have to comply with normal vehicle safety standards?

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Do you mean pedestrians using phones? My first thought was drivers using phones which I see regularly and would be a risk to both pedestrian and cyclist.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Or is the answer simpler than that - is it the rise of SUVs which don't have to comply with normal vehicle safety standards?

The answer the answer is honestly much more complicated than either.

Some is increasing vehicle size and weight that make crashes more deadly to pedestrians. Some is road design that encourage unsafe driving habits, as well as designs that are actively dangerous to pedestrians. Some is new distractions for drivers.