this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
580 points (95.5% liked)

World News

32359 readers
328 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Neoliberalism is a zombie ideology. Read a book: The Shock Doctrine

Printing money only devalues a currency when there’s no taxation to subsequently shred the money.
Second Thought: Why the Government has Infinite Money

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Printing money is like borrowing it from the taxpayers.

If there's hyperinflation, it means that said loan isn't being paid back, far from it actually.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There wouldn’t be any money for taxpayers to pay if the government hadn’t first printed it and spent it on goods and services, eventually ending up in the paychecks of taxpayers .

Hyperinflation is now well understood, and printing money is not, on its own, the cause.
PEGS Institute: What Caused Hyperinflation In Weimar, Zimbabwe And Venezuela?

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Of course it wouldn't be there, I'm not saying that the government spending money at all is bad.

What is bad is the government spending too much money, so much that they introduce way too much money into the economy, making the rest worthless.

Obviously it's a combination of factors, but printing (and then introducing) a shitton of money will have very direct effects on the value of the currency.

[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There wouldn’t be any money for taxpayers to pay if the government hadn’t first printed it and spent it

Money naturally emerges in all civilizations, you don't need a government to centrally manage it. You lack basic economic understanding.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh I see, you’re a bitcoin stan. Tell me more about your galaxy-brained understanding of economics 😂

[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 11 months ago

Ad hominem, why am I not surprised?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

From David Greaber’s and Michael Hudson’s work, I think I have a better understanding than most.

Whether or not you need a government to manage money is neither here nor there. The specific monies that the US & Argentina specifically have are sovereign fiat monies, which are controlled by their governments.