this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

AssholeDesign

7564 readers
4 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
5
Why the 1000-hour light bulb Phoebus Cartel story IS NOT an example of planned obsolescence. (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 year ago by TestZero@lemmy.world to c/assholedesign@lemmy.world
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TLDW: The Phoebus Cartel established 1000 hours as a baseline to get maximum efficiency. longer lasting bulbs would require WAY more power per hour to operate while producing less light.

Planned obsolescence is indeed a thing, but using this as an example of it is incorrect and discredits the overall argument. It's better to focus your attention on right-to-repair laws for your $2000 laptops and $40,000 tractors than on your $2 light bulbs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buffalobuffalo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

#NUANCE NEEDED.

Alec is making a point specifically about the 1000 hour maximum which was for INCANDESCENT lightbulbs. You know, the ones that aren't used anymore.

However, modern LED lightbulbs are typically over-driven and under-cooled. This drastically shortens their lifespan and worsens efficiency. But this might just be because it's harder to sell a $20 light that lasts for 20 years than it is to sell a $5 light that lasts for 5-10.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Or maybe it’s because they both claim to last 20 years and we have no way to compare