I'm not here because Lemmy is a better alternative (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by zephyr@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm here because it's eventually going to be the better alternative.

FOSS by its nature, will keep on improving. And proprietary bloatware, by its nature, will only gonna get worse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ilikespookystories@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

fediverse, eli5?

[-] croobat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You are in your house, I am in mine. But we can still watch movies together through your window.

[-] ultimate_question@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is how I watch all my movies now, I had to find a way that Netflix can't crack down on

[-] Dreadino@feddit.it 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I am not understanding is the concept of logging in another server. I created an account on feddit.it, can I use this account to login in a mastodon website? Or does it work the other way around, with me just using the feddit.it website (like I'm doing right now) to consume content from other instances? With the second option, if feddit.it goes down, my account is done, right?

[-] croobat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your account credentials are the keys to your house, you can only enter to your own house (server/instance) with your keys, but can watch through everyone's window (the owner of your house can block some specific windows tho).

So your second assessment is correct, and yeah I think if the server goes down your data in that instance may be lost. It shouldn't pass long time before some migration account feature (mastodon already has one).

[-] sounddrill@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

That's what I think happens but I'd like to know too

[-] manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech 1 points 1 year ago

based on the same concepts as email, you pick your provider (instance) and you can get messages from anyone using a provider supporting the protocol. The naming system is similar @@instance and !@instance